• Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
  • Events
  • Industry Voice
  • EBooks
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
    •  

      Personalise your on site experience.


      Download and use the apps.


      Access your subscription from outside of the office.


      Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

      • Sign in
     
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Register
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Mental Health & Wellbeing 360

      This time in a digital format, COVER Mental Health & Wellbeing 360 will take a look at the mental health and wellbeing landscape beyond the pandemic, while taking stock of the things we’ve learnt so far from the most challenging health and social crisis of a generation.

      • Date: 25 Mar 2021
      • Digital Conference, Digital Conference
      event logo
      Claims and Underwriting Innovation Forum 2021

      COVER Claims and Underwriting Innovation Forum will investigate the most innovative claims and underwriting practices driving the protection and health insurance market forward. It bears repeating; at the heart of every policy is a human being. As technologies advance and digital capabilities expand, it is crucial that the needs of the customer do not get lost along the way. A personal touch must remain at the centre of every interaction an individual has with an insurance company, either directly or through an intermediary. Hence, this journey is about evolution not revolution.28th April, Digital Conference

      • Date: 28 Apr 2021
      • Virtual Conference,
      View all events
      Follow our events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Industry Voice
  • EBooks
Cover Magazine
Cover Magazine
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
 
  •  

    Personalise your on site experience.


    Download and use the apps.


    Access your subscription from outside of the office.


    Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

    • Sign in
 
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • uncategorised

Market views: Back book selling

  • Cover
  • 07 November 2011
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

At the recent COVER Health and Protection Forum, Clive Waller called for greater regulation of back book selling. Do you agree that this would ultimately benefit clients and the market?

Jules Constantinou, Gen Re

Most market commentary has focused on the premise that closed life firms would be more likely to decline claims as they have an obvious interest to maximise their profits and no commercial interest in treating their customers fairly.

Related articles

  • Risk Clinic: How to secure successful protection sales?
  • Risk Clinic: IFAs and long-term care fees
  • Market Views: How can insurers improve customer service?
  • Market views: Should protection be on the school curriculum?

A reinsurer may in fact have an opposite view of this risk. Most closed-book transactions have been completed by run-off specialists primarily looking to extract value for their shareholders by streamlining all processes and benefiting from the economies of scale that combining numerous portfolios brings.

To the extent that most protection portfolios are heavily reinsured, a justifiable concern for the reinsurer may be that the claims process becomes an administration exercise with not enough due care and attention being paid to the assessment of the claims, and that more claims are paid as a result.

But this does not seem to have happened in practice as we get as many requests for support for ex-gratia claims from our closed fund portfolios as we do from our open portfolios.

The Part VII transfer process that accompanies most purchases involves a High Court hearing, where the judge needs to specifically consider and address the interests of the policyholders.

The purchasing insurer is still subject to the Treating Customers Fairly principle, the ABI Statement of Best Practice with respect to claims, and the claimant still has the right to refer any claim to the FOS.

It appears, therefore, that regulation in this area is sufficient to protect the interests of policyholders.

Neil McCarthy, Direct Life

To know whether it would be of benefit to a client in the future is dependent on the behaviour of the purchaser of the book going forward, compared to the existing practices of the provider that a consumer could expect when they bought a product.

This implies that there is a benchmark that a regulator could measure - which there isn't.

Going back to basics, what the customer wants is confidence in a provider paying their claim.

I'm always quite surprised that when a customer asks: "Does this provider pay claims?", the industry isn't in a strong position to confidently say: "Yes, and here's the data".

I understand the arguments about different definitions, and partial payouts, but it is not beyond the wit of man to create a solution.

If claims payment practices and accurate claims data isn't measured, how would a regulator assess whether an aggregator of back books is behaving differently?

If part of the regulatory requirement was a standardisation and compulsion of claims payment data, then back book purchasers can be assessed against earlier criteria to see if practices have deteriorated.

The publicity of poor claims management ultimately is negative for the whole market, and consumers of risk products should have the confidence that whoever owns their policy, they can expect consistent interpretation of policy terms.

As a holder of risk policies that are now in the hands of a back book manager, and not the provider who I bought them from, I for one would love to see more information on the way they handled claims.

12
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • uncategorised
  • The Part VII
  • ABI
  • FOS
  • Direct Life
  • General Re
  • market views

More on uncategorised

WATCH: COVER Excellence Awards Afterparty DJ Live Stream w/ Waxwork

Get that Friday feeling!

  • uncategorised
  • 13 November 2020
Planet Insurance - Is anger the cost of a GP report?

The news that the ABI and British Medical Association (BMA) agreement on GP report (GPR) fees has broken down will usher in a period of uncertainty.

  • uncategorised
  • 07 February 2012
Call for UK innovation investment as RGA wins in the US

Lack of innovation investment in the UK insurance market has been highlighted by recognition of RGA's work in the US.

  • uncategorised
  • 23 January 2012
Protection 2012 - Facing the future

Protection business in 2012 and 2013 will be affected by events this year and some fundamental changes to the way customers policies are priced into the next. Richard Verdin explains.

  • uncategorised
  • 20 January 2012
EAPs - The pursuit of happiness

Employee assistance programmes are in the spotlight due to a schizophrenic approach by government. But as Sue Weir points out, they are backed by solid research.

  • uncategorised
  • 20 January 2012
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

LifeSearch Awards: Shortlists announced
LifeSearch Awards: Shortlists announced
Craig Brown: If you believe in protection, customers will listen
Craig Brown: If you believe in protection, customers will listen
Insurer Long Covid support 'meets NICE guidelines'
Insurer Long Covid support 'meets NICE guidelines'
From admin clerk to 'industry goliath': 33 years of Richard Kateley
From admin clerk to 'industry goliath': 33 years of Richard Kateley
Healthcare apps in need of regulatory oversight
Healthcare apps in need of regulatory oversight
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing services
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading