• Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
  • Events
  • Industry Voice
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
    •  

      Personalise your on site experience.


      Download and use the apps.


      Access your subscription from outside of the office.


      Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

      • Sign in
     
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Register
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Mental Health & Wellbeing 360
      • Date: 25 Mar 2021
      • Digital Conference,
      View all events
      Follow our events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Industry Voice
Cover Magazine
Cover Magazine
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
 
  •  

    Personalise your on site experience.


    Download and use the apps.


    Access your subscription from outside of the office.


    Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

    • Sign in
 
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • uncategorised

Market views: Back book selling

  • Cover
  • 07 November 2011
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

At the recent COVER Health and Protection Forum, Clive Waller called for greater regulation of back book selling. Do you agree that this would ultimately benefit clients and the market?

Phil Jeynes, PruProtect

There is a concern that customers will have a more negative claims experience from a company which has bought their policy as part of a back book, compared to those whose claims are being assessed by an insurer that continues to accept new business.

Related articles

  • Risk Clinic: How to secure successful protection sales?
  • Risk Clinic: IFAs and long-term care fees
  • Market Views: How can insurers improve customer service?
  • Market views: Should protection be on the school curriculum?

In terms of regulation, any entity p­urchasing a back book must assess claims in line with the policy terms and conditions.

In theory, there should be no difference and the ombudsman could still be used as recourse should a customer feel they have been treated unfairly.

But there remains a suspicion that so-called “grey claims” would be more likely to be declined were they not being looked at by an insurer with its reputation among the public and the intermediary community at stake.

Clearly, firms buying up back books are doing so with profit in mind and we should be wary of the potential for tentative public confidence in protection being eroded.

As an industry, we have done much to build our public image over recent years, but there remains the threat that this good work is undone.

Many insurers have left the market altogether and some of those remaining have become consolidated and their back books made separate.

I doubt we will see valid claims declined simply as a result of the policy being handled by a third party.

The issue will be whether the spirit of the claim is taken into account, rather than just the wording of the documents.

Mark Jones, LV=

Most of the claims we get are clear cut. However, there will always be a number of claims that fall into a grey area as medical practice evolves and the terminology of a few years ago is no longer a perfect fit for the diagnostics of today.

We are trying to get closer to future-proofing through the use of plain English. But without the benefit of hindsight, a few claims are going to require judgment.

I’m confident for all providers when considering these cases there is the desire to do the right thing by the consumer. ­Regulation requires it and the industry attracts those for whom it is second nature.

However, there is an argument that the second order motivators may be different, depending on whether the provider is open for new business and therefore has a vested interest in being seen as reasonable and empathetic towards claimants.

This is in contrast to providers that are closed to new business, where claim decisions have no marketing benefit and can only impact the bottom line.

It is difficult to see how any quoted company could be considered free from the possibility of takeover, so if there is a risk associated with back books, regulation could not be targeted only at the vulnerable.

I don’t agree that further blanket ­regulation would help clients or the market. I do believe that provider choice, not just through identifying the cheapest premium, has to remain one of the main ways in which advisers help their customers.

12
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • uncategorised
  • The Part VII
  • ABI
  • FOS
  • Direct Life
  • General Re
  • market views

More on uncategorised

WATCH: COVER Excellence Awards Afterparty DJ Live Stream w/ Waxwork

Get that Friday feeling!

  • uncategorised
  • 13 November 2020
Planet Insurance - Is anger the cost of a GP report?

The news that the ABI and British Medical Association (BMA) agreement on GP report (GPR) fees has broken down will usher in a period of uncertainty.

  • uncategorised
  • 07 February 2012
Call for UK innovation investment as RGA wins in the US

Lack of innovation investment in the UK insurance market has been highlighted by recognition of RGA's work in the US.

  • uncategorised
  • 23 January 2012
Protection 2012 - Facing the future

Protection business in 2012 and 2013 will be affected by events this year and some fundamental changes to the way customers policies are priced into the next. Richard Verdin explains.

  • uncategorised
  • 20 January 2012
EAPs - The pursuit of happiness

Employee assistance programmes are in the spotlight due to a schizophrenic approach by government. But as Sue Weir points out, they are backed by solid research.

  • uncategorised
  • 20 January 2012
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Johnny Timpson to leave Scottish Widows
Johnny Timpson to leave Scottish Widows
Royal London adds 'innovative' Underwrite Later option
Royal London adds 'innovative' Underwrite Later option
Richard Kateley to retire from Legal & General
Richard Kateley to retire from Legal & General
Matthew Chapman: Seven things I want to see in 2021
Matthew Chapman: Seven things I want to see in 2021
Aviva set to continue working from home following pandemic
Aviva set to continue working from home following pandemic
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing services
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading