Should mortgage protection be compulsory?

clock • 5 min read

In his Mortgage Solutions blog, Connells mortgage services director Ross Bowen argued that protection covers more than just borrowers, helping lenders and brokers too.

David Hollingworth, head of communications at London & Country

This is a question that does tend to crop up on a regular basis.

There is certainly an argument that can be made for a return to the days of mandatory protection.

It would certainly counter the reduced penetration levels of the current protection market, which would help reduce the number of borrowers that are so poorly protected should the worst happen.

However, I think it is difficult to make a move back to a market where borrowers are compelled to take protection after that requirement has been removed.

It also poses a lot of questions about what would be deemed an acceptable level of protection and what form that should take.

There is a need for a much more rounded conversation to take place around protection and which products would suit the client's individual circumstances.

For example, should we insist that the young, single first-time buyer with no dependents should be compelled to take level term assurance to cover their mortgage? Might that only prevent a further, more constructive conversation around income protection and critical illness?

Although a return to compulsion would certainly make life easier for advisers to sell protection products, everything is geared more to the education of consumers about the need to protect and the product suite that is open to them.

Broker focus on protection has improved significantly from the peak of the market and it is important that continues even when the mortgage market improves.

The improved processes that are undoubtedly now in place should develop customers understanding of the need to take protection seriously and initiatives, such as Aviva's recent campaign, will help.

If anything is to be made compulsory, perhaps it will now need to be around the broker ensuring that the client has been made fully aware of the need to consider the protection of their mortgage and the possible ramifications if they don't.

More on uncategorised

Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

1926-2022

COVER
clock 08 September 2022 • 1 min read
COVER parent company acquired by Arc

COVER parent company acquired by Arc

Backed by Eagle Tree Capital

COVER
clock 06 April 2022 • 1 min read

National insurance hike to fund social care faces accusations of 'intergenerational raid'

NICs could be raised 1 percentage point

Hannah Godfrey
clock 20 July 2021 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read