Benefit cutbacks fail to encourage MPPI take-up

clock

Increased MPPI sales due to better products and pricing ' not benefit cuts

Mortgage benefit reform has not led to an increase in mortgage payment protection insurance (MPPI) uptake, according to the Council of Mortgage lenders (CML).

One of the key arguments for 1995's mortgage benefit reforms ' the Government's belief the benefit system was slowing the development of private insurance to cover mortgage payments ' has only been partially borne out by events, a CML study has shown.

The most significant aspect of the reforms was extending the waiting period for entitlement to help with mortgage interest to 39 weeks. This has allowed the Government to cut payments from £1.2bn in 1993 to £500m in 2000, although the report notes this was against a backdrop of falling unemployment.

Sales of MPPI have been growing steadily since the CML and the Association of British Insurers began monitoring its take-up in 1998. But the CML said this is largely due to better products, pricing and awareness, rather than as a result of the benefit cutbacks.

Laura Shanks, product development manager at Scottish Equitable, believes the cuts have mainly been used as a sales tool as many people do not understand how little benefit they will be entitled to. But what effect this has had on the public's perceptions of State support is debatable.

She said: 'When working with IFAs we highlight exactly what the State will provide, so that they can show clients it is not going to give as much help as many think it will.'

The report also states that extending the qualifying period for State help with mortgage payments has weakened the safety net for home owners. The research warned that the full impact of reforms is yet to be tested by a significant economic downturn, but concludes the benefit reforms are likely to lead to an increase in repossessions, if unemployment were to rise suddenly.

Commenting on the report, Peter Williams, deputy director general of the CML, said: 'Some homeowners may not be able to afford insurance and are not entitled to the Housing Benefit available to tenants ' including those that work. The introduction of a Housing Tax Credit would remove a bias, meaning homeowners on low incomes are treated less favourably by the State than tenants. Government, lenders and insurers must continue to work together to create fully sustainable home-ownership.'



More on uncategorised

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Four in five carers with health conditions consider giving up their jobs

Jen Frost
clock 14 November 2024 • 3 min read
Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

1926-2022

COVER
clock 08 September 2022 • 1 min read
COVER parent company acquired by Arc

COVER parent company acquired by Arc

Backed by Eagle Tree Capital

COVER
clock 06 April 2022 • 1 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read