• Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
  • Events
  • Industry Voice
  • EBooks
  • Newsletters
  • Sign in
  •  
    •  

      Personalise your on site experience.


      Download and use the apps.


      Access your subscription from outside of the office.


      Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

      • Sign in
     
      • Account details
      • Contact support
      • Sign out
     
  • Follow us
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • Newsletters
    • YouTube
    • Instagram
  • Register
  • Events
    • Upcoming events
      event logo
      Mental Health & Wellbeing 360

      This time in a digital format, COVER Mental Health & Wellbeing 360 will take a look at the mental health and wellbeing landscape beyond the pandemic, while taking stock of the things we’ve learnt so far from the most challenging health and social crisis of a generation.

      • Date: 25 Mar 2021
      • Digital Conference, Digital Conference
      event logo
      Claims and Underwriting Innovation Forum 2021

      COVER Claims and Underwriting Innovation Forum will investigate the most innovative claims and underwriting practices driving the protection and health insurance market forward. It bears repeating; at the heart of every policy is a human being. As technologies advance and digital capabilities expand, it is crucial that the needs of the customer do not get lost along the way. A personal touch must remain at the centre of every interaction an individual has with an insurance company, either directly or through an intermediary. Hence, this journey is about evolution not revolution.28th April, Digital Conference

      • Date: 28 Apr 2021
      • Virtual Conference,
      View all events
      Follow our events

      Sign up to receive email alerts about our events

      Sign up

  • Industry Voice
  • EBooks
Cover Magazine
Cover Magazine
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Life
  • Critical illness
  • Income protection
  • Health
  • Employee benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • Mental health
 
  •  

    Personalise your on site experience.


    Download and use the apps.


    Access your subscription from outside of the office.


    Get relevant news and insight straight to your inbox.

    • Sign in
 
    • Account details
    • Contact support
    • Sign out
 
  • Individual Protection

Government Covid support policies failing women

Policies favour male-dominated sectors

Government Covid support policies failing women
  • John Brazier
  • John Brazier
  • @brazier_john
  • 15 February 2021
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
0 Comments

Women and Equalities Committee report highlights lack of adequate job security and care services

A new report has found that government support benefits arising from the Covid-19 pandemic are having a disproportionate impact on men and women, with policies "repeatedly skewed towards men".

The Women and Equalities Committee published its report, Coronavirus and the gendered economic impact, last week, finding men and women have been affected differently due to existing gendered economic inequalities, the over-representation of women in certain types of work and the actions the government has taken.

Related articles

  • Simplyhealth appoints Dr Sneh Khemka as new CEO
  • Insurers sign up for Explaining Underwriting Decisions agreement
  • Canada Life rolls out group income protection support
  • L&G trials home blood pressure testing initiative

The report raises concerns that recovery plans have a "heavily gendered nature", as investment plans favour male-dominated sectors, such as science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) and construction, and this can potentially create unequal outcomes and exacerbate existing inequalities.

We need to see more than good intentions and hoping for the best. The government must start actively analysing and assessing the equality impact of every policy, or it risks turning the clock back."

The provision of childcare support services also features heavily within the report, with findings detailing evidence of a heavier childcare burden falling upon women during the pandemic, putting additional pressure on working mothers, as well as instances of pregnant women being pushed to take unpaid leave or early maternity leave.

Passive approach

Committee chair, MP Caroline Nokes, said that the safety nets put in place by the government since the onset of the pandemic have overlooked the caring inequalities women face; specific issues that should be understood and addressed, but have been neglected by the government's response.

"This passive approach to gender equality is not enough. And for many women it has made existing equality problems worse: in the support to self-employed people, to pregnant women and new mothers, to the professional childcare sector, and for women claiming benefits. And it risks doing the same in its plans for economic recovery," Nokes commented.

The report highlighted that women were a third more likely to be employed in sectors that were closed during the initial national lockdown and at greater risk of job losses or being placed on the furlough scheme.

Meanwhile Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) women were disproportionately employed in less secure, low quality work arrangements the report said, such as zero-hours contracts or temporary employment, and suffering greater income losses and working hours than those on secure contracts as a result.

The report puts forward a range of 20 key recommendations and timeframes for delivery that the Committee are calling for the government to act upon, covering issues including caring support services, financial benefits and flexible working arrangements.

"We need to see more than good intentions and hoping for the best. The government must start actively analysing and assessing the equality impact of every policy, or it risks turning the clock back," said Nokes.

Action needed

Among the recommendations are calls for the government to conduct and publish assessments on initiatives such as the Self Employed Income Scheme (SEIS), which would "draw on existing inequalities" and "better protect those already at a disadvantage in the labour market, including women."

The report also recommends maintain increased financial support -  such as increases to the Universal Credit standard allowance - review childcare support provision, conduct an economic growth assessment of care-led recovery proposals, and change legislation that requires employees to wait six months to request flexible working arrangements, as " the pandemic has clearly demonstrated that it is unhelpful and unnecessary."

Johnny Timpson, Scottish Widows' financial protection technical and industry affairs specialist, states that the report should prompt insurance industry participants to assess what they can do in terms of support in the here and now.

"This is a focus on the provision of financial resilience and protection health checks for those facing the loss of any occupational death in service benefits due to redundancy, where there is no scheme life cover continuation option available or it's poorly communicated," he says.

"Especially so for those women with financially dependent partners, children, ‘kidults' plus those, and there will be many, who may also be carers and/or sandwich carers."

'Vulnerable'

The Women and Equalities Committee's report was published the same week as stark new data from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) that found around half of the UK adult population, or 27 million people, is classified as "financially vulnerable".

The FCA's report is based on data collected in February last year and another in October, six months after the pandemic struck in March. The data shows that 60% of UK adults, approximately 16.2 million, that show low financial capabilities are women.

Kate Richardson, head of inclusion at Quilter said: "These sobering figures seem never-ending in the 220+ page report and should act as a firm wakeup call for the government and the financial services sector. Are the policies, products and processes accessible and designed to be inclusive?  Why are groups of people so excluded, and why are the differences so stark?"

"As we move forward we need to consider what barriers exist to a more inclusive financial services sector, and we need to be more considerate of the needs of different groups of people.  There is significant opportunity to help through financial advice and guidance."

Further reading

FCA: More than half of UK adults 'financially vulnerable'
  • Adviser / Broking
  • 11 February 2021
  • Tweet  
  • Facebook  
  • LinkedIn  
  • Send to  
  • Topics
  • Individual Protection
  • Income Protection
  • Employee Benefits
  • Regulation
  • Diversity
  • The Women and Equalities Committee
  • caring support
  • gender equality
  • support
  • UK government
  • Covid 19
  • FCA

More on Individual Protection

Insurers sign up for Explaining Underwriting Decisions agreement

19 firms

  • Underwriting
  • 01 March 2021
L&G trials home blood pressure testing initiative

Virtual screening

  • Underwriting
  • 01 March 2021
Over 50s at risk of financial vulnerability during pandemic

SunLife survey shows

  • Income Protection
  • 26 February 2021
COVER Claims & Underwriting Innovation Forum: Registration now open

Evolution not revolution

  • Underwriting
  • 25 February 2021
LV= extends terms of life insurance plans

Maximum terms increased

  • Individual Protection
  • 25 February 2021
blog comments powered by Disqus
Back to Top

Most read

Insurers sign up for Explaining Underwriting Decisions agreement
Insurers sign up for Explaining Underwriting Decisions agreement
From admin clerk to 'industry goliath': 33 years of Richard Kateley
From admin clerk to 'industry goliath': 33 years of Richard Kateley
Patrick Watt: How we must diversify to close the healthcare inequity gap
Patrick Watt: How we must diversify to close the healthcare inequity gap
John Brazier: A new era for COVER
John Brazier: A new era for COVER
Employees struggling with relevance of group protection for wellbeing
Employees struggling with relevance of group protection for wellbeing
  • Contact Us
  • Marketing services
  • About Incisive Media
  • Terms and conditions
  • Policies
  • Careers
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletters
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

© Incisive Business Media (IP) Limited, Published by Incisive Business Media Limited, New London House, 172 Drury Lane, London WC2B 5QR, registered in England and Wales with company registration numbers 09177174 & 09178013

Digital publisher of the year
Digital publisher of the year 2010, 2013, 2016 & 2017
Loading