FSA ruling could prompt mis-selling scandal

clock

Depolarisation: Exclusion of protection products may cause consumer confusion

The Financial Services Authority's (FSA) decision to exclude protection products from the menu under its depolarisation rules could indirectly lead to another mis-selling scandal, according to Nick Kirwan, marketing director for protection at Scottish Widows.

As part of the rules, which came into effect on 1 December 2004, advisers have to disclose a menu about the fees or commission they charge.

This helps to relate the cost of receiving advice to a clear statement of what services are being provided. However, this will not apply to protection products.

The FSA said the decision was made because the menu is mainly for investment products, with protection products having its own layer of regulation. Incorporating them into the menu could place general insurance firms at a competitive advantage, as it would demand different disclosure requirements from different companies selling the same products.

Arguing that the exclusion could effectively lead people to believe that price is the only differential between protection products, Kirwan said the FSA's decision could have catastrophic consequences.

"There is an underlying fear that people will assume that protection products are only commodities. While to some extent, that is the case for life cover, it cannot be said about other products such as critical illness and income protection," he said.

Kirwan added that this thinking could cause some serious problems further down the line, with consumers opting for cover purely on price, believing all the same products within the same genre offer the same benefits.

"In five years' time this could lead to a mis-selling scandal," he warned. Emphasising his concern, Kirwan added that as this is very likely to happen, he believes the FSA is likely to change its mind within the next two years.

Commenting on the decision, Ruth Excell, spokesperson for the FSA, said while depolarisation rules only apply to investment products, the decision is unlikely to cause any future problems.

"As far as protection products are concerned, intermediaries still have to provide key facts about their services," she said.

Apart from having to provide a menu, the new regime allows advisers to offer advice on products from the whole of the market, a single provider or from a limited number of providers. Firms will have a six-month transitional period before they have to comply with the new rules.

More on uncategorised

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Four in five carers with health conditions consider giving up their jobs

Jen Frost
clock 14 November 2024 • 3 min read
Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

1926-2022

COVER
clock 08 September 2022 • 1 min read
COVER parent company acquired by Arc

COVER parent company acquired by Arc

Backed by Eagle Tree Capital

COVER
clock 06 April 2022 • 1 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read