Insurers called to defend their reputation

clock

Think Tank: Should the industry promote paid claims to combat bad publicity?

Insurers should do more to publicise paid claims statistics, according to guests at COVER's latest Think Tank.

Discussing the future of critical illness (CI) insurance, John Joseph, principal of John Joseph Financial Services, said that firms need to promote their claims statistics if they wish to see an increase in consumer confidence.

"This would show consumers that insurers are also paying out a large number of claims," he said. Joseph added that it could help repair some of the damage caused by recent TV programmes, which have painted a skewed picture of the product.

"It can not do the industry any good when all insurance companies are tarred by one of these programmes," he said. Agreeing with Joseph, Nick Kirwan, marketing director for protection at Scottish Widows, said that although there may only be one firm that has been depicted as not paying out valid claims, it will eventually affect the whole industry. "Three months after one of these programmes has been aired, consumers won't remember what company it was. They will just remember it was an insurance company," he said.

Joseph agreed, and called on the industry to do more to defend its reputation. "I want to see the industry take action against the television production companies that are misleading the public by biased and untrue reporting of claims," he said.

However, Richard Walsh, head of health at the Association of British Insurers (ABI), stressed that publishing claims figures for individual firms could prove quite dangerous.

"I think there is a danger that people will read a lot more into that information than is actually there. The difference in claims statistics between different companies could be related to a number of things, for example, a company's client base.

"For the consumer to assume that the covered company was paying out more claims than another company would be wrong," he said.

Following the recent calls for insurers to be more transparent on both paid and declined claims, Walsh said he had no problems with individual firms revealing data. "It is each company's decision to publish its own claims statistics. However, I don't think an overall comparison between companies would be very helpful," he added.

nFor the full debate, please see the Think Tank supplement free with this issue of COVER.

More on uncategorised

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Simplyhealth releases employer guide amid unpaid carer challenges

Four in five carers with health conditions consider giving up their jobs

Jen Frost
clock 14 November 2024 • 3 min read
Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

Queen Elizabeth II dies after 70 years on the throne

1926-2022

COVER
clock 08 September 2022 • 1 min read
COVER parent company acquired by Arc

COVER parent company acquired by Arc

Backed by Eagle Tree Capital

COVER
clock 06 April 2022 • 1 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read