Half of parents have no protection to cover work absence

MetLife research shows

Jaskeet Briah
clock • 1 min read

Half of UK parents (52%) had no protection in place to cover time taken off work to care for their child if they were unwell or had an accident, according to research from MetLife UK.

The protection and employee benefits provider surveyed 3,003 employed and self-employed parents with a child/children aged 22 and under. Among the parents without protection, over half (56%) were self-employed, 65% worked part-time and 39% were employed on zero-hour contracts. MetLife said that should parents have to take time off due to childcare needs, this group of parents in particular face the highest financial risk by having no formal plan to fall back on in an emergency. The main reasons parents had no financial protection in place were due to affordability concerns (44%), a...

To continue reading this article...

Join COVER for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, key trend analysis and industry insights.
  • Stay on top of the latest developments around health and wellbeing, diversity and inclusion and the cost of living crisis.
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletter.
  • Members only access to monthly programme 'The COVER Review'
  • Be the first to hear about our CPD accredited events and awards programmes.

Join now

 

Already a Cover member?

Login

More on Individual Protection

Over one third of Gen Z don't see protection need for under-35s

Over one third of Gen Z don't see protection need for under-35s

Vitality research findings

Jaskeet Briah
clock 27 May 2026 • 2 min read
MetLife UK launches virtual physio

MetLife UK launches virtual physio

Available to individual protection customers

Cameron Roberts
clock 26 May 2026 • 1 min read
The COVER Review: Protection sales, fit notes and long-term care

The COVER Review: Protection sales, fit notes and long-term care

Week commencing 18 May 2026

COVER
clock 22 May 2026 • 1 min read