Four in five consumers want transparency on restricted protection product searches

Transparency important for consumers

clock • 2 min read

The vast majority of consumers want to know if the search carried out by advisers to find their protection product is restricted to only certain providers, according to new research.

In a poll of 2,000 people carried out by Opinium last week for Protection Review, the majority (88%) said it is important to be explicitly told if a comparison site, adviser or bank was not searching the whole market. Almost half (49%) said they feel it is very important to have this information, while just 12% thought it was not important to know this. The findings come amid heated discussions in the protection sector about the use of restricted panels, and whether the consumer is being made aware of these restrictions. Particular concern about the practice has been raised followi...

To continue reading this article...

Join COVER for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, key trend analysis and industry insights.
  • Stay on top of the latest developments around health and wellbeing, diversity and inclusion and the cost of living crisis.
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletter.
  • Members only access to monthly programme 'The COVER Review'
  • Be the first to hear about our CPD accredited events and awards programmes.

Join now

 

Already a Cover member?

Login

More on Regulation

FSCS expects 2027/28 levy to hit £360m

FSCS expects 2027/28 levy to hit £360m

Current levy bill unchanged at £247m

Jenna Brown
clock 12 November 2026 • 2 min read
FCA: Pure Protection Market Study does "not give a clean bill of health" to industry

FCA: Pure Protection Market Study does "not give a clean bill of health" to industry

Firms still need to demonstrate fair value

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 November 2026 • 2 min read
Budget 26: Protection and health reacts

Budget 26: Protection and health reacts

A missed opportunity

Cameron Roberts
clock 28 October 2026 • 5 min read