The perils of misreading the regulator

Loaded premiums and MS24/1

clock • 4 min read

Tony Müdd, divisional director - development and technical consultancy, St. James’s Place, discusses how the loaded premium conversation is far from finished in the wake of the FCA’s Pure Protection Market Study interim findings.

At first glance, the FCA's interim report on the pure protection market looks like a victory for loaded premiums. No regulatory intervention, no finding of consumer harm and no immediate challenge to a business model that many have long defended. Those manufacturers and distributors who offer and use loaded premiums may feel they have won. They may even feel slightly smug. They have not and should not. What they have secured is something much narrower: a regulator that has not yet been able to prove harm using the data available. That is not the same as being right and it is certainly...

To continue reading this article...

Join COVER for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, key trend analysis and industry insights.
  • Stay on top of the latest developments around health and wellbeing, diversity and inclusion and the cost of living crisis.
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletter.
  • Members only access to monthly programme 'The COVER Review'
  • Be the first to hear about our CPD accredited events and awards programmes.

Join now

 

Already a Cover member?

Login

More on Regulation

Burnham to propose social care plans at general election

Burnham to propose social care plans at general election

Aims to be preventative

Jaskeet Briah
clock 28 September 2026 • 2 min read
The COVER Review: FCA Pure Protection Market Study, KBW and IPAW

The COVER Review: FCA Pure Protection Market Study, KBW and IPAW

Interview with FCA's Graeme Reynolds

COVER
clock 25 September 2026 • 1 min read
PFS names Kate Gannon as president

PFS names Kate Gannon as president

Previous vice-president for PFS

Jenna Brown
clock 24 September 2026 • 2 min read