The consultation paper reiterates the government's legal interpretation that the judgment will apply to new contracts entered into after 21 December 2012 only.
It seeks views on this legal interpretation and the accompanying draft regulations.
The paper is also looking for comment on the government's impact assessment and requests additional data that would help it better understand the impact on consumers and insurers.
In March, the ECJ ruled that the use of gender as a risk factor by insurers should not result in individual differences in premiums and benefits for men and women, with effect from 21 December 2012.
Although the government continues to believe this judgment is detrimental for consumers, there is an obligation to implement it into law.
Mark Hoban, the financial secretary to the Treasury, said: "While nobody should ever be treated unfairly because of their gender, financial services providers should be allowed to make sensible decisions based on sound analysis of risk.
"We continue to work hard with other Member States and the Commission to secure legal certainty for industry and reduce any detrimental effects for consumers."
The consultation closes on 29 February 2012.
Ministerial Statement outlining the government's interpretation
Advertisment
Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.
All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.
Advertisment
Visitor Comment
Add your comment
Add your comment
ECJ gender ruling
The first time Hoban has said anything sensible. Just a shame that our politicians won't tell the EU to **** off. This ruling is illogical to the point of being ridiculous. Mind you, it underlines just how powerless Cameron will be in trying to negotiate better terms with the Eurozone - he thinks we are all stupid but it is him and most of the politicians that rule us who are too arrogant to see how stupid they all are.
Posted by: Bill Wells | Dec 08 2011
Add your comment