This has raised fears advisers are being left behind other industry parties and could be vulnerable to another probe by the regulator into their sales processes.
As COVER revealed in August, the guidelines was created with the aim of pre-empting censure by the FSA following its damning review of oral CI sales (including face-to-face) under ICOBS rules.
The finalised guidelines , originally proposed as scripts but later redefined less rigidly, were authorised for distribution towards the end of 2010.
The ABI believed it was the Association of Independent Financial Advisers' (AIFA) job to relay them to advisers.
However, despite having several months to initiate the mail-out, many advisers and major networks have not seen or even heard anything about the final version of the guidelines.
In what appears to have been a miscommunication between the bodies, AIFA said it was not aware of this responsibility after its involvement in the production of the guidelines ended.
It has clarified though that any advisers wishing to obtain a copy of the guidelines should contact AIFA directly.
Some of the UK's largest adviser networks were among those to be left in the dark.
A spokesman for Sesame Bankhall said: "We would be interested in seeing them and we may use them if they would be beneficial."
Their fears were echoed by Dean Mason, financial planner at Masons Financial Planning, who feared advisers were being excluded.
"It has to be an inclusive process," he said.
"Everyone is dealing with the public regardless of what regulations they are working under and should be given the same opportunity, because that is only treating the customer fairly. We should all be singing from the same hymn sheet," he added.
Andrew Ward, partner of Your Sure, agreed the lack of communication was worrying.
"It is absolutely concerning because we don't know where we are. I would like the chance to see these guidelines. We may find we are not that far off with what we do now, but we don't know."
Advertisment
Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.
All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.
Advertisment
On Air Studio, 32-34 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 8JB
Visitor Comment
Add your comment
Add your comment
Miscommunication my a***
Regardless of ABI and FSA's role, the point is that Aifa knew that if members were not made aware of these guidelines they could find themselves at risk. This should have been enough for them to ensure that their members (no-one expects them to act for non-members) were made aware of them and had access to a copy - even if it meant directing them to ABI or FSA. And yet, even now, hours after this story broke, there is absolutely nothing on their website. This is incompetence and indifference - nothing to do with 'miscommunication'. Are we really to suppose that ABI has access to Aifa's membership database and would mailshot members on Aifa's behalf? Do me a favour. How much longer will Aifa's Council tolerate this couldn't-care-less approach to members? Talking of the Council - Sesame Bankhall say they had no knowledge of these guides, which Aifa was supposedly involved in creating, and yet their CEO is Deputy Chairman of Aifa! The words p***-up and brewery spring to mind. Eggs on several faces I think.
Posted by: "Jim Royle" | Feb 02 2011
Another nail in the coffin
I'm now so fed up with what I thought once was a decent trade body, that I am stopping my subscription as of now. AIFA may have a point though. It has a membership to serve, not IFAs overall. The notice SHOULD be coming from the regulator. The ABI are provider led not adviser led. Upshot is. All three are in the dock. We may act miracles but we are not psychic and shame on the FSA for delegating their rtesponsibilities....Again.
Posted by: Peter Callomon | Feb 02 2011
Not us Guv
So Aifa is aware that advisers might be at risk but did not consider it their responsibility to let their subscription-paying members know? Who the heck did they think was responsible? As Richard Littlejohn might put it "you couldn't make it up".
Posted by: Helen Simms | Feb 02 2011
Add your comment