CIExpert - How is PruProtect different?

clock

CIExpert is frequently asked why the PruProtect plan is not included within the comparison section of the site. Alan Lakey explains.

There are numerous ways in which the PruProtect plan not being included within the comparison section of CIExpert may yet be resolved, but it might prove useful to compare PruProtect with some of the other quality plans on the market.

PruProtect has many options, and for this comparison the comprehensive Serious Illness version with the ‘minimum protected account’, ‘booster’ and ‘children’s cover’ options excluded is used.   

The problem with any such evaluation is that it is like comparing a chimpanzee with a monkey; outwardly there is a similarity but, in reality, they are two different species.  Severity-based cover may often overlap with standard CI design but it varies in many ways, such as not applying a monetary limit on conditions that other insurers would term ‘partial payments’.

Conversely, for conditions for which other insurers agree 100% payments, it frequently pays out a lower percentage.

PruProtect advises that it covers 166 specific conditions.  Of these, only 26 are guaranteed to pay 100% of the insured amount, with a further 28 paying 100% or less depending on the severity level. The remaining 113 conditions will pay between 5% and 75% of the insured amount. 

Cancer is the most claimed-for condition, averaging 64% of all payments during 2012. To illustrate the differences between PruProtect and four leading insurers, we need to look at how the various cancer conditions are dealt with.

Table 1 shows that, unlike other insurers, PruProtect differentiates between cancer stages 1, 2 & 3.  Put simply, stage 1 cancer can usually be completely removed surgically if small enough; stage 2 has advanced but has yet to reach the lymph nodes; and stage 3 has advanced to the lymph nodes, from where it is able to spread throughout the body.

PruProtect pays 25% at stage 1, 50% at stage 2 and 100% if stage 3. This contrasts with the 100% paid at all stages by all other insurers. Conversely, other forms of pre-cancer such as Myelodysplasia provide for lower amounts but would not be covered by other insurers.

To truly compare the PruProtect cancer cover one needs full knowledge of the stages at which cancer sufferers are diagnosed. This information is rarely made available but for bowel cancer we know that 9% are diagnosed at stage 1, 24% at stage two and the remaining 67% at stages 3 & 4.

In simple terms, this means that for every 100 bowel cancer claimants, PruProtect would pay 25% to 9 claimants, 50% to 24 claimants and 100% to the remaining 67.
In conclusion, the trade-off is whether adviser and client prefer a wider range of coverage with the consequence of a possible lower percentage payout, or the certainty of payout for a lower number of conditions.

Alan Lakey is director of CIExpert Ltd

 Table 1  PruProtect Aviva Friends Life LV= Skandia
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Acute Myeloid Leukaemia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Aplastic Anaemia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Cancer TNM Stage 3 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Stage C 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease Ann-Arbor Stage 3 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Advanced Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Ann-Arbor Stage 3 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Cancer TNM Stage 2 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease Ann-Arbor Stage 2 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Advanced Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Ann-Arbor Stage 2 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Multiple Myeloma 50% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Myelodysplasia Intermediate 1 50% - - - -
 Cancer – excluding less advanced cases 25% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Low Grade Prostate cancer 25% 20% 25% 25% 25%
 Carcinoma in-situ of Oesophagus 25% - - - 25%
 Marrow Aplasia 25% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Mastectomy for Carcinoma in-situ of Breast 25% 20% 12.5% 12.5% 25%
 Myelodysplasia – low risk on IPS system 15% - - - -
 Lumpectomy for Carcinoma in-situ of Breast 10% 20% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
 Carcinoma in situ of Cervix requiring hysterectomy 5% 20% 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
 Carcinoma in situ of a Testicle 5% 20% - 12.5% 12.5%
 Carcinoma in situ of Urinary Bladder 5% - 12.5% 12.5% 12.5%
 Carcinoma in situ 5% - - - -
 Benign Spinal Cord Tumour 5% 100% 100% 100% 100%
 Non-malignant Pituitary Adenoma 5% 20% 12.5% - -
 Non-Melanoma skin cancer – squamous and basal cell 5% - - - -

More on PMI

Three quarters of adults say private healthcare is unaffordable
PMI

Three quarters of adults say private healthcare is unaffordable

Benenden Health research shows

Jaskeet Briah
clock 26 March 2024 • 2 min read
NFP acquires PMI intermediary
PMI

NFP acquires PMI intermediary

Bolstering employee benefits capabilities

Jaskeet Briah
clock 26 March 2024 • 1 min read
Corporate demand drives insured private health admissions
PMI

Corporate demand drives insured private health admissions

Self-pay admissions are plateauing

Jaskeet Briah
clock 25 March 2024 • 2 min read

Highlights

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

COVER Survey: Advisers damning of protection insurer service levels

"It takes longer than ever to get underwriting terms"

John Brazier
clock 12 October 2023 • 5 min read
Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

Online reviews trump price for young people selecting life and health cover

According to latest ReMark report

John Brazier
clock 11 October 2023 • 2 min read
ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

ABI members with staff neurodiversity policy nearly doubles

Women within executive teams have grown to 32%

Jaskeet Briah
clock 10 October 2023 • 3 min read