Claims handling firms named and shamed after PPI sting

telephone

Claims management companies (CMCs) mislead claimants and frequently flout marketing rules, according to a mystery shopping exercise carried out by consumer group Which?

Posing as individuals who believed they had been mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI), representatives from Which? investigated the practices of 25 CMCs.

Most of the companies did not follow rules set out by the Ministry of Justice, and Which? identified problems with every CMC it contacted.

Two thirds failed to advise the caller about their option to complain via the Financial Ombudsman Service, despite being required to do so.

Among the worst culprits for this, according to Which?, were WeFightAnyClaim, Belmont Thornton, Challenge Your PPI, Fast Track Reclaim, The Claim Guys, Brunel Franklin, Consumer Finance Claims, Canary Claims and Aims Review.

Six CMCs repeatedly told the caller they had more chance of success or would receive more compensation using a CMC than by submitting a claim independently.

For example, WeFightAnyClaim, told the caller "you have over a 90% chance of claiming it through us, or under a 10% chance of doing it by yourself".

Which? also found contract terms that were unfair. The typical fee charged by a CMC is 30% of the compensation received (25% plus VAT), but the definition of ‘compensation' varied.

Consumers might assume that the fee would be calculated based on the lump sum of money paid to them, but some firms include a reduction in future loan repayments as part of the compensation. Which? said, as a result, some people could receive far less than they expect, and in some cases even end up owing the CMC money.

Richard Lloyd, executive director of Which?, said: "Claims management companies must clean up their act.

"All too often, consumers are being misled about their chances of success and how much they'll have to pay - the last thing people need if they've already fallen victim to the PPI mis-selling scandal.

"We look forward to the Ministry of Justice taking swift enforcement action where appropriate, based on the findings of our investigation."

Martin Lewis, of MoneySavingExpert.com, added: "Even if the claims handling companies all played it by the book, with mis-sold PPI payouts of £3,000 to £5,000 now being commonplace, the price charged is far too high."

Visitor Comment

Add your comment

  

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
Submit your comment

Claims handling firms named and shamed after PPI sting

Is Which? really surprised with it's findings? It helped to champion the rise of the CMC monster which has lead to a number of these companies "trying it on" because they feel that they've nothing to lose. My Firm is currently spending a small fortune in man hours defending an inappropraite claim from a CMC. The only cost to them so far has been a template letter and a cheque for £1

Posted by: Paul Lynch | Sep 21 2011

Follow us now

For all the latest news and views from COVER

Follow us now

Advertisment

Email alert

Register for the COVER newsletter today

Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.

Print Edition

coverprintedition

Cover - everything you need to know about the protection and health insurance market

All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.

REQUEST A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

IFAonline Jobs

IFAonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies now.

Advertisment

Events

iml1543-cover-webinar-5bb9e

Cover Webinar

04 Jul 2012-

London

protection-and-health-forum-2012

Cover Protection and Health Forum 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

cover-excellence-2012

Cover Excellence Awards 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

MORE EVENTS