More than 5,000 fewer people were granted ESA in the last three months for which data is available than in the previous quarter.
In fact, during this period statistics showed the overall proportion of claims approved for ESA fell to just 23%.
However, there was a small rise in the number of people qualifying for the most severely affected support group where no work activity is required.
Since the benefit was introduced in 2008 only 7% of those who applied have been found disabled enough to qualify for the support group, according to the new figures.
A further 17% were required to perform tasks as part of the work related activity group, which also includes a smaller level of payment than the support group.
More than a third (38%) have been found ineligible for the benefit following a work capability assessment (WCA), with 36% not completing their claim.
Reasons for not completing a claim range from those who choose to give up to some who die before it is completed.
The statistics cover the benefit's inception in October 2008 until the end of February 2011, with the three months to February being the newest data available.
In that quarter, 400 more claimants were approved for the support group than in the previous three months (13,000, 8% of the total, compared to 12,600, 7.6%).
However 5,700 fewer claimants were awarded the work related activity benefit (25,300 compared to 31,000) which reduced the success rate of applications to 15.8% from 18.8%.
Overall, applications were down 2.9% from 165,000 to 160,100 during the period.
The full data spreadsheet is available here.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) statement said that Ministers believe the increase in the number of people going into the support group shows that the changes that have been made to the WCA are starting to make a difference and more people are getting long term unconditional support.
Chris Grayling MP, the Employment Minister, added: “We are seeing an increase in the number of severely disabled people being given long-term unconditional support, which shows that our reforms to the work capability assessment are starting to work.
"However, it's clear that the majority of new claimants to sickness benefits are in fact able to return to work.
“For those that need additional help our new work programme is up and running and will tailor support to people's needs so that they can overcome whatever barriers they face."
The WCA has been widely criticised by charities and disability rights groups who have also targeted Atos Healthcare, the outsource company that conducts the interviews.
Advertisment
Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.
All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.
Advertisment
Visitor Comment
Add your comment
Add your comment
Polarisation
If genuine, great for the seriously ill and high time too. But there is a big gap between 12 months and for ever in which Mr Grayling has no interest because if you can't get better in 12m you must be a scrounger.
Posted by: TJ | Oct 27 2011
Fewer Qualifying for ESA
The system of assessment is a disgrace. A close relative of mine was summoned to an interview with one of Atos's so called doctors. He never made eye contact with her during the whole of the interview, instead he was focused on his monitor screen all of the time while typing in many inaccurate and untrue answers to his questions. The end product report he produced contacted almost a dozen untruths concerning what she could or could not do. Needless to say her case was appealed and won. It is a known fact that Atos so called doctors are paid a bonus on results. How any good self respecting doctor can work in their system is beyond my comprehension. Unfortunately this system brow beats the least able or articulate and many accept the decisions without being confident they can succeeed on appeal. Regardless of what the figures say the system is a very unfair one.
Posted by: John Smyth | Oct 26 2011
Stating the Obvious
Chris Grayling says "However, it's clear that the majority of new claimants to sickness benefits are in fact able to return to work." He says this as if it were some recent discovery, as if it had been insomesort of dispute. It's probably always been the case that the majority of people who sign on the sick only sign on temporarily then return to work but by his phrasing he suggests that the majority wish to sign on permanently but are being found out by the super new testing. This is highly and probably deliberately misleading. Yet again Chris Grayling makes an obvious and ham-fisted attempt to conceal the truth of the matter from discovery, begging the questions, what's he afraid of people knowing and why does he still have a job in public life? BB
Posted by: Bill Kruse | Oct 26 2011
Add your comment