The plea came in response to the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) consultation ‘The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA): Approach to Regulation'.
The trade bodies, which announced a potential merger in May 2011, outlined their concerns under three headings: proportionality, transparency and rules.
The FCA was urged to take a fresh look at the rules to clarify and simplify the current handbook, taking into account the needs and characteristics of insurance brokers.
Eric Galbraith, Biba chief executive, said: "The creation of a new regulator gives us a unique opportunity for a fundamental review of the way general insurance brokers are supervised. We would like the new regulatory regime to be more approachable, more knowledgeable about the markets and more sensitive to practical aspects of compliance, for both small and large firms."
Research carried out by Biba earlier this year was used in the response to highlight that the risks posed by general insurance brokers to the regulatory objectives are minimal.
Steve White, Biba's head of compliance and training, said: "This makes a compelling case for a more focused approached on the risks we pose, rather than just increasing the burden of regulation. Going forward we want to see proportionate, cost effective and appropriate regulation."
Barbara Bradshaw, chief executive of the IIB, added: "It is important that the FCA has sufficient expertise, understanding, flexibility and resources to be able to respond to the differing demands of supervising the wholesale and retail insurance broking communities."
The response said that compliance was over-complicated and resource-intensive and called for simplification of the existing rulebook. It also said that the level of fees and levies, which are the highest for insurance brokers in the EU, along with the cost of compliance threatened the viability of firms. In its conclusion, Biba and the IIB called for the FCA to adopt more open and transparent procedures for budgeting and cost allocation.
This article is taken from COVER's sister title Insurance Age.
Advertisment
Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.
All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.
Advertisment
Visitor Comment
Add your comment
Add your comment
6 years late
Whilst the sentiment is right it is only 6 years late in delivery. This problem has been with UK Insurane brokers since the General Insurance Standards Council was abolished a the FSA took over. First IFA's need to know that BIBA represents numerous stakeholders and not Brokers alone. This compromises its position as it can only speak in generality as a result. The IIB suffered teh loss of its CEO and sincethat time has been running out of puff and the merger is more like a throwing in of the towel by the IIB executive. A merger somewhat akin to the present government set up where a junior partner is subsumed by the major one. Teh merger is a bad day for UK Brokers as they will lose their sole voice. The fact that this problem has been around since 2005 just goes to show how behind the curve BIBA are, and to suggest hat it it becuase of the new regulatory set up must bve viewed as crass nonsense. I just hope the IFA representative body is a damn site more effective that BIBA for all your sakes as anyone who is behind the curve on so many issues is not a body you need either think or worry about as serving any purpose.
Posted by: Robert Marshall | Sep 01 2011
Add your comment