PruProtect calls for protection to be compulsory

deepak03

PruProtect has called for protection insurance to be made compulsory and said it is already seeing signs of advisers switching to protection to anticipate the Retail Distribution Review (RDR).

The provider revealed it made a profit of £2.2m in the half year to June with a market share of around 7%.

Its range of products released this year is accounting for around 30% of new business requests, although this is predominantly through the whole of life (WoL) and accelerator plans.

Speaking at a media briefing to announce the results, Deepak Jobanputra, actuarial and product director at PruProtect, addressed the concept of simple products and suggested that, for the public's good, protection should be mandatory.

"What the market interprets as simple is around price and therefore cheaper," Jobanputra said.

"We focus on people's needs but what consumers are focused on is buying life cover as cheap as possible.

"Everyone needs critical illness not just life cover. Protection insurance should be compulsory."

Herschel Mayers, CEO of PruProtect, added: "I think we should lobby for that."

Jobanputra continued: "People are engineering these risks without understanding what the consequences are."

The call appears to contradict the ABI which has largely avoided pushing for most insurances to be compulsory.

Nick Kirwan, assistant director of health and protection at the ABI, told COVER that while there was a need for people to protect themselves, there were significant problems with making this mandatory.

"What do we do with people who are ineligible due to ill health," he said.

"And you need to think about what to do to people who don't do it? Are you criminalizing them?"

Kirwan also highlighted that the compulsory motor and employers liability insurances were largely to fulfill third party legal obligations.

Addressing the market post-RDR, the provider said it was "already seeing high net worth brokers entering into protection" in preparation.

Visitor Comment

Add your comment

  

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
Submit your comment

Tricky

Surprised the hasn't been lots of comments on this? Everybody has different protection needs so you would need to make it compulsory to have different things at different stages of your life so that inappropriate cover wasn’t being pushed on people.  Forcing a single person with no dependents to take out life cover would be a bit like forcing someone who walks to work to buy car insurance because one day they may need it. The public would see it as another tax as well.

Posted by: Roger Edwards | Sep 06 2011

Follow us now

For all the latest news and views from COVER

Follow us now

Advertisment

Email alert

Register for the COVER newsletter today

Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.

Print Edition

coverprintedition

Cover - everything you need to know about the protection and health insurance market

All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.

REQUEST A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

IFAonline Jobs

IFAonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies now.

Advertisment

Events

iml1543-cover-webinar-5bb9e

Cover Webinar

04 Jul 2012-

London

protection-and-health-forum-2012

Cover Protection and Health Forum 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

cover-excellence-2012

Cover Excellence Awards 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

MORE EVENTS