Market views: Sexing-up IP

armitage-neil-seated-cutout

With take up of sales in income protection (IP) by advisers so low, reflecting in low consumer sales, what could be done to the product to make it more attractive to IFAs, apart from increased commission?

Neil Armitage, Foresters Friendly Society

Education is the starting point. One of the core improvements would be a more flexible and speedier acceptance process with varying degrees of questions. This would mean that, barring extreme circumstances, a client will have their application accepted without having to go backwards and forwards to a doctor for health confirmation caused by over zealous underwriting.

There is a strong case for having a product with a choice of different access levels. For example, full and comprehensive cover targeting a completely healthy individual down to a very basic acceptance level with minimal cover, and different stages in-between, dependent on lifestyle and other factors.

Other different levels of cover could also be dependent on age, lifestyle, profession and so on with different deferred periods and varying benefit payment time.
A reduction in paperwork required in application forms, both for the adviser and client is another major consideration.

There always seems to be a lot of unnecessary and irrelevant questions on application forms which can be very burdensome for the adviser. This can lead to some key pieces of information being missed which can mean it takes longer to get the right level of cover.

Another issue with all types of insurance is the claims process – shortening and simplifying this would make IP more effective and a more attractive proposition for advisers to recommend to their clients.

Paul Doyle, Net Worth Financial Planning

It reminds me of the Monty Python sketch describing the stereotypical accountant as “Drab, awful and boring”. Well, that’s our old friend IP I’m afraid, I mean, “permanent health insurance”.

Is it any wonder that the name alone has IFAs falling asleep at their desks, never mind failing to capture the public’s attention towards what, without doubt, is one of the most important pillars in our protection portfolios.

Providers need to carry out a much needed product face lift, raising the its profile in an interesting and appealing way towards IFAs and the public alike. This would resurrect what has become a sterile product which IFAs have largely ignored and transform it to its rightful position as a crucially important product safeguarding the very fabric of our lifestyles.

Bright Grey is a great example of a company who have realised this fact and who lead the way with their fresh and innovative approach. It follows that IFAs promoting Bright Grey’s product are more energised and motivated to discuss this vital area with their clients.

Visitor Comment

Add your comment

  

Add your comment

We won't publish your address
Submit your comment

IP No Unemployment Cover = No Relevane

Unless Income Protection includes unemployment cover as does STIP (short-term Income Protection with 12 or 24 months benefit), it will never engage fully with the majority of the public. The working population believe that with modern medical help, the possibility of being unable to work due to ill health for many years to be extremely remote indeed. I would bet many regular folk would rate their odds of winning the lottery considerably higher. Whereas, the same people accept there is a very real possibility of being out of work for 6 to 12 months. However worthy IP is as a product and despite the very convincing case studies, it will only be bought by a risk adverse minority. Joe Public will only part with their hard earned cash if they perceive that they have a pretty strong chance of claiming/benefiting from the product. This is the ‘disconnect’ of IP. It will never be a sexy product indeed its declining appeal is obvious. As a specialist provider of STIP and MPPI that are sold on-line both direct and through affiliates we have studied this at some length. Our growing number of insurance intermediaries are almost universal in their feedback; the product is bought for the ‘redundancy cover’ alone. The accident and sickness cover is only appreciated if policyholders claim, but hardly any have been off work long enough to claim for their full 12 months benefit. This certainly adds to the evidence that the current IP products lack relevance. It is the heart of the issue, the complexity of the apply process and commission rates are simply diversions.

Posted by: iprotect Insurance | Dec 07 2011

Sexing up IP

I don't know what it says about me but I don't find IP at all boring.I am a mortgage specialist and get immense satisfaction from doing IP and yes, most of the time it is more important than critical illness.I do think making children's cover a standard feature as it is with serious illness would be a big improvement. I developed aa method several years ago of doing a seperate interview to the mortgage interview where I go through buildings and contents, life and critical illness,income protection , serious illness and then ASU. It has been tremendously successful ; the clients tend to say " We want that, that and that" and it hardly feels like selling. I find that presented with the generic features, hardly anyone now wants critical illness comapred to serious illness

Posted by: Des Platt | Dec 07 2011

Follow us now

For all the latest news and views from COVER

Follow us now

Advertisment

Email alert

Register for the COVER newsletter today

Stay up to date with all the latest news, product development and changes happening within the protection and health insurance market.

Print Edition

coverprintedition

Cover - everything you need to know about the protection and health insurance market

All of the latest news and features on all aspects of the protection and health insurance market are available from our print edition.

REQUEST A PRINT SUBSCRIPTION

IFAonline Jobs

IFAonlinejobs will open the right investment career path for you. Search hundreds of vacancies now.

Advertisment

Events

iml1543-cover-webinar-5bb9e

Cover Webinar

04 Jul 2012-

London

protection-and-health-forum-2012

Cover Protection and Health Forum 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

cover-excellence-2012

Cover Excellence Awards 2012

04 Oct 2012- 04 Oct 2012

Park Plaza Victoria, London

MORE EVENTS